iamlegend
Untouchable
Go Fuck Yourself
Posts: 93
|
Post by iamlegend on Jul 14, 2006 21:17:19 GMT -5
in your little FAQ you just happened to mention one thing that threw me for a loop. in your answer to 911 you said this:
[glow=red,2,300]specifically the fact that our government backs Israel,who are actually some of the worst terrorists around[/glow]
you realize that by saying this you make the top of the list of idiots right? of course you dont, and i am sure that you will have some type of response, so i beg you to bring it. any respect i may have ever had for you went right out the door with that one. you are a complete fucking moron, dude. you have just shown how clueless you really are. If i was where you are i would beat the fuck outta you, boy.
edit: oh yeah dumbfuck, you linked to an article written by David Duke you moron. you realize he is one of Americas great racists and one time KKK leadman right? that translates to anti-semitism, and yet you are so smart you use a biased-as-fuck, anti-semite, ex-clansmen who was jailed for fraud and tax evasion, written article to prove your point in a thread about the 50 biggest internet idiots when making a point about Israel.. good fucking job braniak. again, if i were there, i would beat you to death.
|
|
|
Post by Fickle81 on Jul 14, 2006 22:57:41 GMT -5
in your little FAQ you just happened to mention one thing that threw me for a loop. in your answer to 911 you said this: specifically the fact that our government backs Israel,who are actually some of the worst terrorists around you realize that by saying this you make the top of the list of idiots right? of course you dont, and i am sure that you will have some type of response, so i beg you to bring it. any respect i may have ever had for you went right out the door with that one. you are a complete fucking moron, dude. you have just shown how clueless you really are. oh yeah dumbfuck, you linked to an article written by David Duke you moron. you realize he is one of Americas great racists and one time KKK leadman right? that translates to anti-semitism, and yet you are so smart you use a biased-as-fuck, anti-semite, ex-clansmen who was jailed for fraud and tax evasion, written article to prove your point in a thread about the 50 biggest internet idiots when making a point about Israel.. good fucking job braniak. Sorry,but I wasn't present at the meeting where it was decided that stating facts made you an idiot or clueless...probably because no such meeting was ever held and no such decision ever made. I realise it may be difficult for a jarhead such as yourself to look at anything objectivly,especially because I seem to remember blind praise of Bush on your part that borderlined fellatio (which pretty much automatically disqualifies your opinion on the matter as far as I'm concerned),but the FACT is that Israel are in fact terrorists,and that because the U.S. backs said terrorists,that makes our foreign policies hypocritical and fucked up. You wanna question the motivations behind David Duke's article based on his affiliations,eventhough the sources he uses don't share or are involved in said affiliations,and past history? Ok...lets use something else then: www.giwersworld.org/israel/terrorists.phtmlOh wait,the author's name is "Amir Meshkin",meaning he's most likely a Muslim and a biased source (not to mention he wrote "quiet" instead of "quite"),so that isn't gonna work...how bout this? www.cactus48.com/terrorism.htmlIn case you want to skip to the end... www.cactus48.com/conclusionI.html(and thats obviously a JEWISH author due to his constint referal use of the word "we") www.cactus48.com/conclusionII.htmlSo it seems that EVEN SOME JEWISH PEOPLE agree that Israel is a terrorist nation. www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?ItemID=5169www.apfn.net/messageboard/10-26-03/discussion.cgi.117.html[/u] In 1967, the Israelis forced another 350,000 Palestinians to flee the West Bank and Gaza as well as 147,000 Syrians from the Golan Heights. Since 1967 Israel has placed the entire Palestinian population of the Territories under military occupation.[/quote] I could provide even more sources,but I think you get the idea...and before you make any sort of accusations of favoritism or alliance,Palestine are terrorists as well due to the tactics they use...but that does NOT change the following conclusion: [fact]Israel are not only terrorists,but their inception was founded by terrorism.[/fact] I have a question for you,and your answer may very well determine how much more I disqualify your opinions on this and other things of similar political nature...I'm assuming,seeing as how you used to be in the military,that you're against flag burning like every other sock sniffer who shares this belief? Dispite the fact that every person has the right to do so via the First Amendment? If i was where you are i would beat the fuck outta you, boy. again, if i were there, i would beat you to death. Whatever you say,jarhead... And btw,a little more off topic and for the record...you didn't beat me in ANY debate/argument on whether or not The Thing was a remake on DD like you claimed after I was banned,especially seeing as how you had an instance of misquoting by thinking I said something when it was in fact N2N that said what you claimed I said. In your own words,"good fucking job braniak." P.S. Hows BD treating ya under your new Ken Titus screen name?
|
|
iamlegend
Untouchable
Go Fuck Yourself
Posts: 93
|
Post by iamlegend on Jul 14, 2006 23:36:36 GMT -5
when a person like you is beat, all they know to do is blindly swing. keep swinging would ya. i wont debate much with you because i have learned that you , as the master fuckface of the net, will think you have won even as your corpse is assraped by a gang of black panthers who hate white geeks.
did i win the remake fight? yes. easily. do i need to copy/paste/quote to prove it? no.
Jarhead? you better go wayyy back and try again. oh wait, someone like you wouldnt know the difference between branches or MOS's anyway. so ill let your lack of a clue slide on that one. even though to anyone who knows the "jarhead" comment to a guy who was 11B in the army makes you look like a gay hippie who flat out has no clue about how shit really works in the real world, only a view you have gleaned from lack of sex excluding net porn for 25 or so years. if you are gonna play smart, at least TRY to get your shit straight would ya? also, as someone who served calling me a name used to denote someone who served is not an insult. it just shows that you prefer the taste of my dick in your mouth over your daddy's.
I didnt read all your links there , you summed em up with this:
[glow=red,2,300]So it seems that EVEN SOME JEWISH PEOPLE agree that Israel is a terrorist nation.[/glow]
hey wow! thats fuckin brilliant! guess what..........some americans think the same thing about america. what a fucking revelation. some Palestinians do not agree with Hamas either you fucking tard. it still only proves that a geek like you can google, and also that you dont really understand what it is you are googling, only that you have a need to continue and try to prove your point at the expense of yourself looking like even more the tard.
you continually quote things that are completly biased and stem from a MUSLIM view of the facts, while at the same time you ignore the true history of the problem. Islam started and was based on a lie from the beginning, and people like you who wont get off of your little scrawny ass and learn anything are the problem with the world today.
as for this:
[glow=red,2,300]i have a question for you,and your answer may very well determine how much more I disqualify your opinions on this and other things of similar political nature...I'm assuming,seeing as how you used to be in the military,that you're against flag burning like every other sock sniffer who shares this belief? Dispite the fact that every person has the right to do so via the First Amendment?[/glow]
wrong again fag. burning a flag is fine by me, they have the right to do it just like i have the right to kick their ass for doing it. see how freedom isnt a one way street?
and as for this:
[glow=red,2,300]P.S. Hows BD treating ya under your new Ken Titus screen name?[/glow]
eh?
so, until you can show something other than a tard biased view of the palestine/israel situation, i can only look down on you as a complete fool and make this board better by continuing to expose you ( like i need any help, you do it just fine by yourself) for the idiot you really are.
here is a good challenge:
prove by a picture that you have made out EVER with a girl. till then.................................GFY ( and im proud of the way you have taken my use of GFY and adapted it into your own pseduo-anti-everyone stance. once again.....ghey)
|
|
|
Post by Fickle81 on Jul 15, 2006 14:49:37 GMT -5
when a person like you is beat, all they know to do is blindly swing. keep swinging would ya. i wont debate much with you because i have learned that you , as the master fuckface of the net, will think you have won even as your corpse is assraped by a gang of black panthers who hate white geeks. Says the guy who has yet to provide one single factual source that backs up any of his claims. "thinking I have won even as your corpse is assraped by a gang of black panthers who hate white geeks"? Funny and ironic that you should mention that...read on... did i win the remake fight? yes. easily. do i need to copy/paste/quote to prove it? no. You should...because if you posted every single one of my responses and yours during that argument,which includes a certain dipshitted mistake on your part (see next paragraph),you'd see that you really didn't win shit...doing so would make this fact that you didn't win anything apparent to even some domesticated household pets. Actually,you know what? I'll do it for you,but first I need to make a correction of a mistake on my part...you didn't mistake something N2N said for something I said,but rather,mistaked an N2N statement as being about what a remake is rather than what a plothole is (the latter which is what N2N's statement was addressing and not the former)...I was wrong in saying the first part and I apologise. Now that we've negated that first paragraph of yours that basically implied that I never admit any wrongdoing,onto the proof that you won nothing: THIS was my initial rebuttal to swivel's claim that Haute Tension's ending was a gaping plothole or copout or some typical stupid shit like that. Then THIS is where you questioned my rationale of Haute Tension with it not having any plotholes,while claiming N2N stole a statement from Wikipedia without providing a link as proof,AND adding in what Wikipedia claims a remake is. THIS was my response to all of that,in which you pretty much STFU afterwards... ...That is until THIS (a full 5 days later) where all the sudden you claimed you "owned me" in the remake argument,when you actually hadn't said a thing after I disproved your statement that started said argument,which includes your false subject application of an N2N statement. Then finally we have THIS,which includes me pointing out your incorrect subject application of N2N's statement in question,which once again,caused you to shut your jibs...that is until THIS,where you waited until AFTER I was banned and couldn't reply to repeat the "I won the remake argument" statement verbatim,not realising that just because you say you won doesn't make it so,especially seeing as how every one of my responses made you temporarally stop flapping your gums. By the way,this wouldn't happen to be an example of "thinking you have won even as your corpse is assraped by a gang of black panthers who hate white geeks" on YOUR part,now would it? Jarhead? you better go wayyy back and try again. oh wait, someone like you wouldnt know the difference between branches or MOS's anyway. so ill let your lack of a clue slide on that one. even though to anyone who knows the "jarhead" comment to a guy who was 11B in the army makes you look like a gay hippie who flat out has no clue about how shit really works in the real world, only a view you have gleaned from lack of sex excluding net porn for 25 or so years. if you are gonna play smart, at least TRY to get your shit straight would ya? You DO realise that my use of the term "jarhead" was used for nothing more than dramatic effect,right? If not,you're an even bigger idiot than I thought. And yes,I'm well aware that jarhead is a slang term for a Marine btw... Wow,nice deceptive way of claiming that I'm a virgin...NOT. Sorry guy,but I lost it when I was 18 to a wonderful girl who I'd probably still be with had it not been for my stupidity in getting "involved with" a sociopathic whore whom I met and got "involved with" before meeting said great girl. Not having sex for a good 4 years is of my own choosing,because I'm not a whore like you and a lot of men seem to be...and yea,I've gotten some female attention that could have lead to some great fucking during these 4 years (most of them were already involved,and I refuse to be "that guy"). also, as someone who served calling me a name used to denote someone who served is not an insult. It is if the person getting insulted with the term seems to exemplify the typical blind patriot former serviceman,who seems to support and stand behind his country no matter how wrong it is...you seem to fit that example quite nicely,hence the intent of the dramatic effect of using the term "jarhead" (which also indicates that because the individual was a former serviceman,that automatically makes them an untouchable badass,which you also seem to fit THAT example as well)...and I hope you haven't ever been implying that I've ever been in the military,because you'd be sorely mistaken. it just shows that you prefer the taste of my dick in your mouth over your daddy's. 0.5/5Cmon,you can do better than that... I didnt read all your links there , you summed em up with this: So it seems that EVEN SOME JEWISH PEOPLE agree that Israel is a terrorist nation. Actually,I only summed one of them with that statement...[sarcasm]thats some great reading comprehension though...[/sarcasm] hey wow! thats fuckin brilliant! guess what..........some americans think the same thing about america. what a fucking revelation. some Palestinians do not agree with Hamas either you fucking tard. If you would have bothered to realise that my indication that "even some Jewish people think Israel are terrorists" was designed to negate your rant about David Duke being racist and anti-semitic,eventhough the sources he used don't share his affiliations and history,you'd realise that there would have been no need to type out that stank tirade above. it still only proves that a geek like you can google, and also that you dont really understand what it is you are googling, only that you have a need to continue and try to prove your point at the expense of yourself looking like even more the tard. I'd rather be "a geek that can google" than a willfully ignorant (IE stupid) jarhead who doesn't even bother to list any factual source(s) to back up his absurd claims. You wanna know what I googled to find those sources? "Israel+history of terrorism". Oh yea,it REALLY sounds like I don't understand what I'm googling,especially seeing as how due to the exact query I used,it seems fairly obvious that I knew that Israel are terrorists before I googled anything and that I wasn't nessacerilly executing a biased search,huh moron? you continually quote things that are completly biased and stem from a MUSLIM view of the facts, while at the same time you ignore the true history of the problem. Islam started and was based on a lie from the beginning, and people like you who wont get off of your little scrawny ass and learn anything are the problem with the world today.Thank you...that instance of intolerant bigotry did more to prove my point than I ever could have...yet you get on David Duke for being a racist? Go make a phone call to the kettle to say it's black. Since I'd like to entertain myself further at your expense,exactly what "lie" is Islam based on? I sincerely hope for your sake and the sake of your already bullshit stance that this isn't gonna turn into one of those "Islam is evil and all Muslims are terrorists" dumbass rants. So I guess that Jewish individual,who went into painstaking FACTUAL details about Israel's history of terrorism,did so with a Muslim point of view,right? Nice deduction Sherlock Dipshit. as for this: i have a question for you,and your answer may very well determine how much more I disqualify your opinions on this and other things of similar political nature...I'm assuming,seeing as how you used to be in the military,that you're against flag burning like every other sock sniffer who shares this belief? Dispite the fact that every person has the right to do so via the First Amendment? wrong again fag. burning a flag is fine by me, they have the right to do it just like i have the right to kick their ass for doing it. see how freedom isnt a one way street? Actually,you don't have that right at all...thats called assault,which is a felony punishable by jail/prison time. And what exactly am I wrong about,genius? I asked a legite question,and unlike what you THINK I meant by it,I didn't imply anything other than your answer would determine whether or not I take you even less seriously than I already do. I never implied that you thought flag burning should be illegal or was wrong...if I wanted to imply that,I wouldn't have even bothered asking the question,would I "braniak"? and as for this: P.S. Hows BD treating ya under your new Ken Titus screen name? eh? Yea I'm pretty sure you're playing dumb at this point... so, until you can show something other than a tard biased view of the palestine/israel situation, i can only look down on you as a complete fool and make this board better by continuing to expose you ( like i need any help, you do it just fine by yourself) for the idiot you really are. How the fuck am I biased? Did I not also say that Palestine are terrorists as well? Jesus,pull your head from out of Bush's ass long enough to learn exactly what terrorism is and what biased means. here is a good challenge: prove by a picture that you have made out EVER with a girl. till then.................................GFY ( and im proud of the way you have taken my use of GFY and adapted it into your own pseduo-anti-everyone stance. once again.....ghey) Well,for one,I fail to see how this is a good challenge at all...because anybody that equates intelligence/attitude/tastes/how manly you are/etc. with making out and sex is pretty much a complete neanderthal. Secondly,I don't have any photos of myself making out with any women,because apparently unlike you,I don't feel I need to advertise and show off. Unfortunatly,I've LONG gotten rid of a certain picture of a certain sociopathic slut I alluded to earlier making out with another chick,which both of them allowed ME to take. Third of all,when in the blue hell have I EVER used that acronym? Forth of all,I don't have an "anti-everyone stance",ya blowhard...not even a pseudo (not pseduo) one. Fifth,and finally... "ghey" has to be one of the lamest internet words in the history of time...
|
|
iamlegend
Untouchable
Go Fuck Yourself
Posts: 93
|
Post by iamlegend on Jul 15, 2006 15:28:30 GMT -5
the remake debate is dead guy. you lost that one, get over it and move on. that is at least 2 years old now anyway, and after 2 years im the one who proved you wrong. the end. as for the jarhead thing, you do know that i know what you left out of your answer because you dont really know wtf you are talking about. and reading comprehension is obviously not big on your list either, as much as you like to use that on others, you are guilty of it to a gross degree. and save that ex-girlfriend in the Niagra falls area shit would ya. its a fucking insult, no need for you to try and debate an insult, thats just fucking stupid (oh wait, its you!) so: [glow=red,2,300]Not having sex for a good 4 years is of my own choosing,because I'm not a whore like you and a lot of men seem to be...and yea,I've gotten some female attention that could have lead to some great fucking during these 4 years (most of them were already involved,and I refuse to be "that guy"). [/glow] yeeeeaaaaaahhhhhhhh. i dont fuck girls. not because i am a twerp of a man with nothing about me worth considering, but because i choose not to. im choosing it, see. clue: you are "that guy" in so many ways you fail to see ( the one who always throws a hissy fit when someone else fucks the girl he likes, but deep down knows he could never have anyway, ya know, all that yada yada you deal with all the time) [glow=red,2,300]and I hope you haven't ever been implying that I've ever been in the military,because you'd be sorely mistaken. [/glow] not even close. again, reading comprehension, eh. and the only sore thing would by my fist after busting your little toothies out the back of that paper thin skull of yours you cannot negate my rant about David Duke because i am right. the end. he is an ex-clansmen anti-semite. that is a fact. nothing you do will ever take that away from the argument. Its like quoting Gacey on a dissertation about babysitting schoolboys. [glow=red,2,300]I'd rather be "a geek that can google" than a willfully ignorant (IE stupid) jarhead who doesn't even bother to list any factual source(s) to back up his absurd claims. [/glow] i dont need to list sources to prove that Israel are the ones defending themselves, and have been doing so for a VERY long time. The basis of the entire fight over the Holy Land is biblical. thats a fact. the sons of Abraham fight over land rights by birth from genesis to this day. Issiac vs Ishmael. the big lie of Islam is that the land should go to Ishmael, not Issaic. Islam starts around 600 AD, a good couple thousand years AFTER the OT was penned by any reckoning. I do not need to google this because i know all of this already. Israel upon its inception after WW2 was invaded by the surrounding arab countries, and they have endured the attacks of radical Islam since. its called self defense Kefka, and they have that right. There never has been a sovergn nation of Palestine, and when offered the chance to have one, the notion was rejected. Islam is based of ridding the holy land of the infidels (that would be non-muslims). A holy land they lay claim to via a lie implying that Ismael is the rightful heir, when he never was. the rest is history. so basically, you google israel+terrorist and get a page by David Duke and use it to prove your point. of course you have no idea who David Duke is so now you have to try and pretend like you did know what you were doing when in actuality you didnt. i was born in NOLA and grew up in Mississippi, so i have a good deal of experience where it concers David Duke. you didnt have a clue, and now you will try to act like you did, when we all know you didnt, you just randomly googled some shit and used it. lame. anyone can google anything on the net and find someone else who agrees with whatever it is they want to try and prove. just because some guy writes something down about what he thinks doesnt mean he is right. case in point: YOU. some examples of David Duke you didnt know about when you used him a a source to back your opinion (taken from www.adl.org/learn/ext_us/duke.asp the anti-defamation league) Perhaps America's best-known racist, David Duke was instrumental in the Klan resurgence of the 1970s. He has since continued to propagandize white supremacist views as a frequent political candidate, with a variety of fringe organizations and, in recent years, in Russia, Europe and the Middle East. Duke's messages typically include conspiratorial depictions of Jewish power and Jewish hatred for non-Jews, a combination he refers to as "Jewish supremacism." some quotes of his: “White people don't need a law against rape, but if you fill this room up with your normal black bucks, you would, because niggers are basically primitive animals.” —The Sun (Wichita, Kan.), April 23, 1975 “Our clear goal must be the advancement of the white race and separation of the white and black races. This goal must include freeing of the American media and government from subservient Jewish interests.” —“Klan Code of Conduct,” Duke Speaks Out, a column in the Crusader (newspaper of the KKKK, then led by David Duke), November 1978 Did you ever notice how many survivors they have? Did you ever notice that? Everybody — every time you turn around, 15,000 survivors meet here; 400 survivors convention there. I mean, did you ever notice? Nazis sure were inefficient, weren't they? Boy, boy, boy!...You almost have no survivors that ever say they saw a gas chamber or saw the workings of a gas chamber.... they'll say these preposterous stories that anybody can check out to be a lie, an absolute lie." ––Evelyn Rich interview, March 1985 “The Jews are trying to destroy all other cultures…as a survival mechanism…the only Nazi country in the world is Israel.” —Ros Davidson interview, May 13, 1990 (quoted in the San Francisco Examiner, November 13, 1991) and a nice picture or 2 of your boy: that "Israel are terrorists" shit you spew is the same tripe people like David Duke put forth. Muslim extremists, neo-nazis, and appently Kefka. and for you to correct my spelling after all those rants of your own about why you "intentionally" misspell is the epitome of hypocrisy. FYI and GFY. ( and yes i know you went back and deleted some of your uses of GFY)
|
|
|
Post by Fickle81 on Jul 15, 2006 19:01:20 GMT -5
the remake debate is dead guy. you lost that one, get over it and move on. that is at least 2 years old now anyway, and after 2 years im the one who proved you wrong. the end. Actually,you didn't because you convienently STFU for days after both of my replys...so not only did you lose,but you're a pussy as well. The end. as for the jarhead thing, you do know that i know what you left out of your answer because you dont really know wtf you are talking about. If it has anything to do with what jarhead means,I didn't leave anything out...it's a slang term for a U.S. Marine...Period. There are no semantics involved. As an insult,it's typically used for a former serviceman who stands by their country no matter how wrong it is and/or somebody who thinks they're a hardass because of having served...you fit both of those bills,hence why that insult was perfect for you for dramatic effect to get my point across that you really know nothing of what you speak. and reading comprehension is obviously not big on your list either, as much as you like to use that on others, you are guilty of it to a gross degree. How exactly? and save that ex-girlfriend in the Niagra falls area shit would ya. its a fucking insult, no need for you to try and debate an insult, thats just fucking stupid (oh wait, its you!) so: #1:Actually nimrod,she lived within a 5 minute walking distance of my father's house (and mine when I was still in high school)...you're off by about 350 miles. #2:No need to debate an insult? Aren't you doing the EXACT same thing with my jarhead insult? Damn you're stupid and contradictive...if you and Rich were women,I'd guarantee you two would probably dyke out...don't bother trying to figure out what I mean by that,why it's relevent,and why it's funny...it's already obvious that it's over your head. Not having sex for a good 4 years is of my own choosing,because I'm not a whore like you and a lot of men seem to be...and yea,I've gotten some female attention that could have lead to some great fucking during these 4 years (most of them were already involved,and I refuse to be "that guy"). yeeeeaaaaaahhhhhhhh. Unfortunatly for you,it's truth... i dont fuck girls. not because i am a twerp of a man with nothing about me worth considering, but because i choose not to. im choosing it, see. clue: you are "that guy" in so many ways you fail to see ( the one who always throws a hissy fit when someone else fucks the girl he likes, but deep down knows he could never have anyway, ya know, all that yada yada you deal with all the time) Does your dumbass even know what I meant when I said "that guy"? I don't even know why I asked that cause it's obvious you don't. "That guy" is somebody that a girl fucks on the side while in a relationship with somebody else,whom if the other person found out about,it would ruin the relationship. I've had several opportunities to become "that guy" with it being pretty obvious that said females wanted me to ram them (contrary to your belief that I deal with female rejection on a daily basis,the only way it could have been more obvious is if they came right out and said "fuck me"),but since I don't want any part of the mess it would cause somebody else's relationship,I didn't because,again,I'm not a whore. and I hope you haven't ever been implying that I've ever been in the military,because you'd be sorely mistaken. not even close. again, reading comprehension, eh. Actually,with your fucked up typing,that seemed a bit difficult to decipher: also, as someone who served calling me a name used to denote someone who served is not an insult. The part in bold and underline,as it reads out,could be interpreted as claiming that me calling you a jarhead isn't an insult based on the fact that I may have served. Heres the CORRECT way to have said what you really meant: Eventhough minicule,that comma makes all the difference in the world. I don't normally rag on somebody's grammar/spelling,but I'm pretty much left with no other choice when somebody who can't even type well to get across what they mean claims I have faulty reading comprehension,as if their faulty typing had nothing to do with my misintrepretation of what they meant. and the only sore thing would by my fist after busting your little toothies out the back of that paper thin skull of yours Whatever you say,jarhead...see? It still fits perfectly. you cannot negate my rant about David Duke because i am right. the end. he is an ex-clansmen anti-semite. that is a fact. nothing you do will ever take that away from the argument. Its like quoting Gacey on a dissertation about babysitting schoolboys. I never said you weren't right about that. Apparently you don't know what negate means just like you don't know what biased means. Negate means to cancel out,or to bring a balance to (the exact definition in this case is "To make ineffective by applying an opposite force or amount"). Using a source that comes from a Jewish individual cancels out the source that came from an anti-semite,because it is the "opposite force". I believe the term you meant to use in your statement above is "debunk",which means to prove wrong...which I never did nor tried to do in the case of David Duke. I'd rather be "a geek that can google" than a willfully ignorant (IE stupid) jarhead who doesn't even bother to list any factual source(s) to back up his absurd claims. i dont need to list sources to prove that Israel are the ones defending themselves, and have been doing so for a VERY long time. Oh you most certainly do. Without evidence to back up this claim,I have nothing but your word for it...which is pretty much worthless because you seem to embody the typical brainwashed American,who just happens to blindly praise Dubya. The basis of the entire fight over the Holy Land is biblical. thats a fact. the sons of Abraham fight over land rights by birth from genesis to this day. Issiac vs Ishmael. Thanks for the irrelevant biblical lesson that doesn't change the fact that both the Palestinians and Israelis fight their war via terrorism... the big lie of Islam is that the land should go to Ishmael, not Issaic. Islam starts around 600 AD, a good couple thousand years AFTER the OT was penned by any reckoning. I do not need to google this because i know all of this already. Israel upon its inception after WW2 was invaded by the surrounding arab countries, and they have endured the attacks of radical Islam since. its called self defense Kefka, and they have that right. There never has been a sovergn nation of Palestine, and when offered the chance to have one, the notion was rejected. Islam is based of ridding the holy land of the infidels (that would be non-muslims). A holy land they lay claim to via a lie implying that Ismael is the rightful heir, when he never was. the rest is history. I sincerely hope for your sake and the sake of your already bullshit stance that this isn't gonna turn into one of those "Islam is evil and all Muslims are terrorists" dumbass rants. Who called it baby? so basically, you google israel+terrorist and get a page by David Duke and use it to prove your point. First of all,the exact search query was "Israel+history of terrorism." Based on that query,the search engine (in this case google) could have interpreted it as either Israel's history of enduring terrorism AND/OR committing terrorism. Like I said,Palestine isn't a saint by any strech of imagination. Second of all,that search query not only lead to the David Duke page,but every other page I've cited as a source. of course you have no idea who David Duke is so now you have to try and pretend like you did know what you were doing when in actuality you didnt. i was born in NOLA and grew up in Mississippi, so i have a good deal of experience where it concers David Duke. you didnt have a clue, and now you will try to act like you did, when we all know you didnt, you just randomly googled some shit and used it. lame. Actually,you're absolutly correct in this case...I didn't particularly know who David Duke was besides the credentials he listed on his page. Maybe thats why I didn't even bother trying to argue your claims of him being a racist and anti-semite and just decided to list other sources besides him that basically said the same thing (and even if you were lying,it still wouldn't have mattered as the other sources were further proof) instead. I understand this is a new concept for you,seeing as how you like to claim I argue absolutly everything dispite being wrong. At least you can take comfort and security in the fact that you're not the only dicktard that actually believes that bullshit. anyone can google anything on the net and find someone else who agrees with whatever it is they want to try and prove. just because some guy writes something down about what he thinks doesnt mean he is right. case in point: YOU.. You're absolutly right...thats why theres this section that was invented for research style writting called "References"...also known as "Footnotes"...also known as "Bibliography". While David Duke may in fact be a racist and anti-semite,at least he provided several sources outside of his own affiliations and unrelated to his own history that backed up his claims. Rather than make an entire section where I list my sources,I list them as I write. The statement of "just because some guy writes something down about what he thinks doesnt mean he is right" is also extremely ironic and hilarious coming from you. some examples of David Duke you didnt know about when you used him a a source to back your opinion (taken from www.adl.org/learn/ext_us/duke.asp the anti-defamation league) Perhaps America's best-known racist, David Duke was instrumental in the Klan resurgence of the 1970s. He has since continued to propagandize white supremacist views as a frequent political candidate, with a variety of fringe organizations and, in recent years, in Russia, Europe and the Middle East. Duke's messages typically include conspiratorial depictions of Jewish power and Jewish hatred for non-Jews, a combination he refers to as "Jewish supremacism." some quotes of his: “White people don't need a law against rape, but if you fill this room up with your normal black bucks, you would, because niggers are basically primitive animals.” —The Sun (Wichita, Kan.), April 23, 1975 “Our clear goal must be the advancement of the white race and separation of the white and black races. This goal must include freeing of the American media and government from subservient Jewish interests.” —“Klan Code of Conduct,” Duke Speaks Out, a column in the Crusader (newspaper of the KKKK, then led by David Duke), November 1978 Did you ever notice how many survivors they have? Did you ever notice that? Everybody — every time you turn around, 15,000 survivors meet here; 400 survivors convention there. I mean, did you ever notice? Nazis sure were inefficient, weren't they? Boy, boy, boy!...You almost have no survivors that ever say they saw a gas chamber or saw the workings of a gas chamber.... they'll say these preposterous stories that anybody can check out to be a lie, an absolute lie." ––Evelyn Rich interview, March 1985 “The Jews are trying to destroy all other cultures…as a survival mechanism…the only Nazi country in the world is Israel.” —Ros Davidson interview, May 13, 1990 (quoted in the San Francisco Examiner, November 13, 1991) and a nice picture or 2 of your boy: Typing all of that was a waste of time...you wanna know why? Because using other sources BESIDES David Duke was me conseding to your points of him being racist and anti-semitic,eventhough I really shouldn't have just taken your word for it (before you posted all of that),and negating my use of him as a source. So basically,you're arguing something I've already moved on from. - <--I'm here. - <--And here you are,still arguing a point down here. that "Israel are terrorists" shit you spew is the same tripe people like David Duke put forth. Muslim extremists, neo-nazis, and appently Kefka. Jewish individuals being Muslim extremists AND neo-nazis? Thats so stupid it's comical... and for you to correct my spelling after all those rants of your own about why you "intentionally" misspell is the epitome of hypocrisy. Ok,I'll give you that one... FYI and GFY. ( and yes i know you went back and deleted some of your uses of GFY) In order to do that,I would have had to have used that acronym to begin with...blatent lying such as this is the reason I don't trust your word any further than I can throw you...or to stoop to your level of insulting:"Your word is Das UberGhey."
|
|
iamlegend
Untouchable
Go Fuck Yourself
Posts: 93
|
Post by iamlegend on Jul 15, 2006 21:01:19 GMT -5
Ok, lets do this one last time:
[glow=red,2,300]Actually,you didn't because you convienently STFU for days after both of my replys...so not only did you lose,but you're a pussy as well. The end. [/glow]
i STFU because i won, and i moved on. unlike you, i dont beat the piss outta the dead horse. i know this is a bitter pill to take, but again, and for the last time on that one: I WON
[glow=red,2,300]If it has anything to do with what jarhead means,I didn't leave anything out...it's a slang term for a U.S. Marine...Period. There are no semantics involved. As an insult,it's typically used for a former serviceman who stands by their country no matter how wrong it is and/or somebody who thinks they're a hardass because of having served...you fit both of those bills[/glow]
wrong. jarhead is NEVER used to refer to anyone who has served. noone calls an ex Air Force airman a jarhead you fucking idiot. since i was in the ARMY, it doesnt apply to me either. making up definitions to words to try and make you right is lame too. so again: I WIN
the entire Kef had a girlfriend once.......................flat out ghey. do you not see how pathetic that makes you look to fight so hard to prove you had a girlfriend once 4 years ago? say it with me: I WIN
[glow=red,2,300]Eventhough minicule,that comma makes all the difference in the world. I don't normally rag on somebody's grammar/spelling,but I'm pretty much left with no other choice when somebody who can't even type well to get across what they mean claims I have faulty reading comprehension,as if their faulty typing had nothing to do with my misintrepretation of what they meant. [/glow]
so when all else fails and you have utterly lost, correct my spelling and typing? in a forum you and I are damn near the only 2 people who will ever see? nice. weak.........................but nice. one time for the jarheads eh: I WIN
[glow=red,2,300]Who called it baby? [/glow]
you called that i would say something akin to islamic terrorists are terrorists? its a fact that islam calls for the removal of infidels from the holy land. a fact. and for our muslim pals: I WIN
so to summarize because i am bored with you now, allow me just a few more quotes from you:
[glow=red,2,300]Ok,I'll give you that one... [/glow]
[glow=red,2,300]You're absolutly right...[/glow]
[glow=red,2,300]Actually,you're absolutly correct in this case...I didn't particularly know [/glow]
[glow=red,2,300]I never said you weren't right about that.[/glow]
[glow=red,2,300]Because using other sources BESIDES David Duke was me conseding to your points [/glow]
and lastly, remember that argument about remakes and me not repling because i was right and had moved on. after which you called me a pussy?
[glow=red,2,300]So basically,you're arguing something I've already moved on from[/glow]
class dismissed jackass.
|
|
|
Post by Fickle81 on Jul 16, 2006 0:17:08 GMT -5
Ok, lets do this one last time: Actually,you didn't because you convienently STFU for days after both of my replys...so not only did you lose,but you're a pussy as well. The end. i STFU because i won, and i moved on. unlike you, i dont beat the piss outta the dead horse. i know this is a bitter pill to take, but again, and for the last time on that one: I WON Allow me to let you in on a little secret,Legend...The ONLY...and I do mean ONLY ways to beat somebody in an argument,and this is how it's been since the origins of communication,is to either prove them wrong to the point that they admit they're wrong and/or get them to walk away from the issue,which is what you actually did (at least temporarally)...by your logic,the U.S. won the Vietnam War because we left and moved on. I know this is a bitter pill for you to swallow,but again,for the last time on this one:YOU. DIDN'T. WIN. SHIT. If it has anything to do with what jarhead means,I didn't leave anything out...it's a slang term for a U.S. Marine...Period. There are no semantics involved. As an insult,it's typically used for a former serviceman who stands by their country no matter how wrong it is and/or somebody who thinks they're a hardass because of having served...you fit both of those bills wrong. jarhead is NEVER used to refer to anyone who has served. noone calls an ex Air Force airman a jarhead you fucking idiot. since i was in the ARMY, it doesnt apply to me either. making up definitions to words to try and make you right is lame too. so again: I WIN Don't try to tell me what jarhead means and what it's used for as slang and insult...I've been well aware for over half of my life...I've even already said that the use of it in this case is nothing but dramatic effect,yet you still continue to prattle on about it...and when I say "typically",that means thats how some Joe Shit The Ragman would use it,as I've seen somebody refer to one of my friends,an army guy,as a jarhead before in public (because he thinks he's hard because he was in the army),with the same dramatic effect purpose...so again:YOU. HAVEN'T. WON. SHIT. the entire Kef had a girlfriend once.......................flat out ghey. do you not see how pathetic that makes you look to fight so hard to prove you had a girlfriend once 4 years ago? say it with me: I WIN Wait a second...wasn't it YOU that brought women into this by claiming I was a virgin in the first place? Yep I'm pretty sure it was...and I've actually had a total of 4 girlfriends in my life (5 if you count the manipulative bitch). Your attempt to get on me for debunking YOUR out the ass talk is hilariously stupid,or as you would say,"lame" and "ghey"...say it with me:YOU. HAVEN'T. WON. SHIT. Eventhough minicule,that comma makes all the difference in the world. I don't normally rag on somebody's grammar/spelling,but I'm pretty much left with no other choice when somebody who can't even type well to get across what they mean claims I have faulty reading comprehension,as if their faulty typing had nothing to do with my misintrepretation of what they meant. so when all else fails and you have utterly lost, correct my spelling and typing? in a forum you and I are damn near the only 2 people who will ever see? nice. weak.........................but nice. one time for the jarheads eh: I WIN Truth hurts,don't it? One more time for the cheap seats:YOU. HAVEN'T. WON. SHIT. Who called it baby? you called that i would say something akin to islamic terrorists are terrorists? its a fact that islam calls for the removal of infidels from the holy land. a fact. and for our muslim pals: I WIN Actually you didn't and actually it's not. You didn't say the goal of fanatical/extremist/radical Muslims was to claim the holy land from the infidels for Islam...you said the ENTIRE RELIGION OF ISLAM'S goal (which also translates into EVERY SINGLE MUSLIM'S GOAL ON THE PLANET) is to claim the holy land from the infidels for Islam...BIG fucking difference,IE one is true (the former) while the other isn't (the latter). And for your Jewish terrorist pals:YOU. HAVEN'T. WON. SHIT. so to summarize because i am bored with you now, allow me just a few more quotes from you: Ok,I'll give you that one... You're absolutly right... Actually,you're absolutly correct in this case...I didn't particularly know I never said you weren't right about that. Because using other sources BESIDES David Duke was me conseding to your points Awww,you're bored with me? Good,that basically translates into me winning the argument. I can play the selective statement/quote editing game too... i wont debate much with you I didnt read all your links there burning a flag is fine by me i am a twerp of a man with nothing about me worth considering i dont need to list sources and lastly, remember that argument about remakes and me not repling because i was right and had moved on. after which you called me a pussy? So basically,you're arguing something I've already moved on from I'm pretty sure claiming to have won,convienently after I was banned and couldn't respond,isn't moving on...
|
|
|
Post by Fickle81 on Jul 16, 2006 18:20:51 GMT -5
|
|
iamlegend
Untouchable
Go Fuck Yourself
Posts: 93
|
Post by iamlegend on Jul 16, 2006 20:42:14 GMT -5
you buy into a lie that has been perpetrated for a very long time. i realize that by posting what i am about to you will just come back and say "i already said Palestinians are terrorists too!", but frankly i dont care what you say about it. lets lead off with this: The Koran: 2:216 Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not. 2:190-193 Fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for Allah loveth not transgressors. And slay them wherever ye catch them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out; for tumult or oppression are worse than slaughter; but fight them not at the Sacred Mosque, unless they (first) fight you there; but if they fight you, slay them. Such is the reward of those who suppress faith. But if they cease, Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. And fight them on until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Allah; but if they cease, let there be no hostility except to those who practice oppression 8:12 Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): "I am with you: Give firmness to the Believers: I will instill terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: Smite ye above their necks and smite all their fingertips off them." and i can do that for days with quotes from the koran. Arabs since written history have been tribal warrior people. such is the case when Islam came to be in the 600"s AD. a religion evolved from their already natural inclination to war, and dont forget at the time there was fighting already between these religious groups. try this out (actually read it idiot) www.ldolphin.org/islamclaims.htmland here is a list of some terrorist attacks against Israel BEFORE the 6 day war of 1967: Jan 1, 1952 - Seven armed terrorists attacked and killed a nineteen year-old girl in her home, in the neighborhood of Beit Yisrael, in Jerusalem. Apr 14, 1953 - Terrorists tried for the first time to infiltrate Israel by sea, but were unsuccessful. One of the boats was intercepted and the other boat escaped. June 7, 1953 - A youngster was killed and three others were wounded, in shooting attacks on residential areas in southern Jerusalem. June 9, 1953 - Terrorists attacked a farming community near Lod, and killed one of the residents. The terrorists threw hand grenades and sprayed gunfire in all directions. On the same night, another group of terrorists attacked a house in the town of Hadera. This occurred a day after Israel and Jordan signed an agreement, with UN mediation, in which Jordan undertook to prevent terrorists from crossing into Israel from Jordanian territory. June 10, 1953 - Terrorists infiltrating from Jordan destroyed a house in the farming village of Mishmar Ayalon. June 11, 1953 - Terrorists attacked a young couple in their home in Kfar Hess, and shot them to death. Sept 2, 1953 - Terrorists infiltrated from Jordan, and reached the neighborhood of Katamon, in the heart of Jerusalem. They threw hand grenades in all directions. Miraculously, no one was hurt. Mar 17, 1954 - Terrorists ambushed a bus traveling from Eilat to Tel Aviv, and opened fire at short range when the bus reached the area of Maale Akrabim in the northern Negev. In the initial ambush, the terrorists killed the driver and wounded most of the passengers. The terrorists then boarded the bus, and shot each passenger, one by one. Eleven passengers were murdered. Survivors recounted how the murderers spat on the bodies and abused them. The terrorists could clearly be traced back to the Jordanian border, some 20 km from the site of the terrorist attack. Jan 2, 1955 - Terrorists killed two hikers in the Judean Desert. Mar 24, 1955 - Terrorists threw hand grenades and opened fire on a crowd at a wedding in the farming community of Patish, in the Negev. A young woman was killed, and eighteen people were wounded in the attack. Apr 7, 1956 - A resident of Ashkelon was killed in her home, when terrorists threw three hand grenades into her house. Two members of Kibbutz Givat Chaim were killed, when terrorists opened fire on their car, on the road from Plugot Junction to Mishmar Hanegev. There were further hand grenade and shooting attacks on homes and cars, in areas such as Nitzanim and Ketziot. One person was killed and three others wounded. Apr 11, 1956 - Terrorists opened fire on a synagogue full of children and teenagers, in the farming community of Shafrir. Three children and a youth worker were killed on the spot, and five were wounded, including three seriously. Apr 29, 1956 - Egyptians killed Roi Rotenberg, 21 years of age, from Nahal Oz. Sept 12, 1956 - Terrorists killed three Druze guards at Ein Ofarim, in the Arava region. Sept 23, 1956 - Terrorists opened fire from a Jordanian position, and killed four archaeologists, and wounded sixteen others, near Kibbutz Ramat Rachel. Sept 24, 1956 - Terrorists killed a girl in the fields of the farming community of Aminadav, near Jerusalem. Oct 4, 1956 - Five Israeli workers were killed in Sdom. Oct 9, 1956 - Two workers were killed in an orchard of the youth village, Neve Hadassah, in the Sharon region. Nov 8, 1956 - Terrorists opened fire on a train, attacked cars and blew up wells, in the North and Center of Israel. Six Israelis were wounded. Feb 18, 1957 - Two civilians were killed by terrorist landmines, next to Nir Yitzhak, on the southern border of the Gaza Strip. Mar 8, 1957 - A shepherd from Kibbutz Beit Govrin was killed by terrorists in a field near the Kibbutz. Apr 16, 1957 - Terrorists infiltrated from Jordan, and killed two guards at Kibbutz Mesilot. May 20, 1957 - A terrorist opened fire on a truck in the Arava region, killing a worker. May 29, 1957 - A tractor driver was killed and two others wounded, when the vehicle struck a landmine, next to Kibbutz Kisufim. June 23, 1957 - Israelis were wounded by landmines, close to the Gaza Strip. Aug 23, 1957 - Two guards of the Israeli Mekorot water company were killed near Kibbutz Beit Govrin. Dec 21, 1957 - A member of Kibbutz Gadot was killed in the Kibbutz fields. Feb 11, 1958 - Terrorists killed a resident of Moshav Yanov who was on his way to Kfar Yona, in the Sharon area. Apr 5, 1958 - Terrorists lying in ambush shot and killed two people near Tel Lachish. Apr 22, 1958 - Jordanian soldiers shot and killed two fishermen near Aqaba. May 26, 1958 - Four Israeli police officers were killed in a Jordanian attack on Mt. Scopus, in Jerusalem. Nov 17, 1958 - Syrian terrorists killed the wife of the British air attache in Israel, who was staying at the guesthouse of the Italian Convent on the Mt. of the Beatitudes. Dec 3, 1958- A shepherd was killed at Kibbutz Gonen. In the artillery attack that followed, 31 civilians were wounded. Jan 23, 1959 - A shepherd from Kibbutz Lehavot Habashan was killed. Feb 1, 1959 - Three civilians were killed by a terrorist landmine near Moshav Zavdiel. Apr 15, 1959 - A guard was killed at Kibbutz Ramat Rahel. Apr 27, 1959 - Two hikers were shot at close range and killed near Massada. Sept 6, 1959 - Bedouin terrorists killed a paratroop reconnaissance officer near Nitzana. Sept 8, 1959 - Bedouins opened fire on an army bivouac in the Negev, killing an IDF officer, Captain Yair Peled. Oct 3, 1959 - A shepherd from Kibbutz Heftziba was killed near Kibbutz Yad Hana. Apr 26, 1960 - Terrorists killed a resident of Ashkelon south of the city. Apr 12, 1962 - Terrorists fired on an Egged bus on the way to Eilat; one passenger was wounded. Sept 30, 1962 - Two terrorists attacked an Egged bus on the way to Eilat. No one was wounded. Jan 1, 1965 - Palestinian terrorists attempted to bomb the National Water Carrier. This was the first attack carried out by the PLO's Fatah faction. May 31, 1965 - Jordanian Legionnaires fired on the neighborhood of Musrara in Jerusalem, killing two civilians and wounding four. June 1, 1965 - Terrorists attack a house in Kibbutz Yiftach. July 5, 1965 - A Fatah cell planted explosives at Mitzpe Massua, near Beit Guvrin; and on the railroad tracks to Jerusalem near Kafr Battir. Aug 26, 1965 - A waterline was sabotaged at Kibbutz Manara, in the Upper Galilee. Sept 29, 1965 - A terrorist was killed as he attempted to attack Moshav Amatzia. Nov 7, 1965 - A Fatah cell that infiltrated from Jordan blew up a house in Moshav Givat Yeshayahu, south of Beit Shemesh. The house was destroyed, but the inhabitants were miraculously unhurt. Apr 25, 1966 - Explosions placed by terrorists wounded two civilians and damaged three houses in Moshav Beit Yosef, in the Beit Shean Valley. May 16, 1966 - Two Israelis were killed when their jeep hit a terrorist landmine, north of the Sea of Galilee and south of Almagor. Tracks led into Syria. July 13, 1966 - Two soldiers and a civilian were killed near Almagor, when their truck struck a terrorist landmine. July 14, 1966 - Terrorists attacked a house in Kfar Yuval, in the North. July 19, 1966 - Terrorists infiltrated into Moshav Margaliot on the northern border and planted nine explosive charges. Oct 27, 1966 - A civilian was wounded by an explosive charge on the railroad tracks to Jerusalem. which brings me to this: THE BIBLE "Sarah your wife shall bear you a son, and you shall call his name Isaac. I will establish My covenant with him as an everlasting covenant for his descendants after him. As for Ishmael, I have heard you; behold, I will bless him and make him fruitful and multiply him exceedingly; he shall be the father of twelve princes, and I will make him a great nation." (Genesis 17:19-20 RSV). and what about ole Ishmael? "Behold, you are with child, and shall bear a son; you shall call his name Ishmael; because The Lord has given heed to your affliction. He shall be a wild ass of a man, his hand against every man and every man's hand against him; and he shall dwell over against all his kinsmen." (Genesis 16:11-12 RSV). that is the root of the conflict, whether you believe in the bible or not, it precedes Islam by a few hundred if not thousand years. has a Jew ever commited an act of terrorism? yes. has an american? yes. does any rational person claim america is a terrorist nation? hello moron, do you not get it? The list of islamic fundie attacks on Israel goes all the way back to Genesis: Genesis 21:9-10 And Sarah saw the son of Hagar the Egyptian, which she had born unto Abraham, mocking. Wherefore she said unto Abraham, Cast out this bondwoman and her son.... (KJV) it doesnt matter if you believe in the bible or the koran, the jews and arabs both believe in them respectively. to ignore this is obtuse, but then again, it is Kefka the dumbass im talking too here. so exactly how long should Israel lay down and let the nations of Iran, Iraq, Syria and terrorists groups without number etc et al, attack them without fighting back? because they are Jews they should just take it? do you think you can beat a murderer in a fight by being diplomatic about things? or will it basically come down to who kills who first? pussies and losers take the diplomatic route when it comes to war. and when war is thrust upon you either way, there is only one answer, and that is to fight. Arabs have set a precedent of hate towards Israel for thousands of years now, and Arab nations set the precedence in support of Hitler and in the 6 Day war of 67'. Israel wont let things slide like we do (we are weak that way)The Holy land has been deeded to the Jews for a very long time, and Arabs do not have the right to kill Jews without regard because they dont have enough sense to move out of a fucking desert and build a house.
|
|
locke
Untouchable
Posts: 6
|
Post by locke on Jul 17, 2006 18:21:59 GMT -5
Will you be commenting on people that make themselves look like idiots via internet videos? No because their idiocy has provided me nothing but joy and entertainment via laughter. Besides,the embarrasment that I'm sure they've endured because of it is good enough retribution for me. The major difference between them and the people on this list is that while most of the idiots on this list have provided me with similar amusement, they've also provided me cringes and probably caused some of my IQ points to drop just from reading their inane bullshit. The irony is truly through the fucking roof...and that's just the tip of the Hypocritical iceberg. Tell me Kefka, all these apparent boards you frequent, all these apparent E-mailed confirmations of friends that have vouched for your idiocy from said boards. All these fucking 'friends' you swear by that can vouch for your badass online persona. But yet not one have apparently signed up with your self-obsessed kefchat board. Why?. You debunk yourself before anybody else even bothers. Your a self-obsessed strange little troll. You deserve pity, yet your total inability to interact outside of your own mind suggest otherwise. Kefka=Chomedy. If nothing else you possess the ability to make people laugh at you. Do your worst...amuse yourself. It truly is the only skill you possess.
|
|
|
Post by Fickle81 on Jul 17, 2006 20:18:09 GMT -5
you buy into a lie that has been perpetrated for a very long time. What lie? The fact that not every single Muslim in the world are terrorists,nor want to reclaim the holy land for Islam? Thats not a lie. Thats fact. i realize that by posting what i am about to you will just come back and say "i already said Palestinians are terrorists too!", but frankly i dont care what you say about it. lets lead off with this: The Koran: 2:216 Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not. 2:190-193 Fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for Allah loveth not transgressors. And slay them wherever ye catch them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out; for tumult or oppression are worse than slaughter; but fight them not at the Sacred Mosque, unless they (first) fight you there; but if they fight you, slay them. Such is the reward of those who suppress faith. But if they cease, Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. And fight them on until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Allah; but if they cease, let there be no hostility except to those who practice oppression 8:12 Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): "I am with you: Give firmness to the Believers: I will instill terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: Smite ye above their necks and smite all their fingertips off them." and i can do that for days with quotes from the koran. Arabs since written history have been tribal warrior people. such is the case when Islam came to be in the 600"s AD. a religion evolved from their already natural inclination to war, and dont forget at the time there was fighting already between these religious groups. Article titled "Right Islam vs. Wrong Islam"www.futureofmuslimworld.com/research/pubID.37/pub_detail.aspIt seems you still aren't able to seperate regular Muslims with extremist Muslims. Dave Chappelle of all people,is a Muslim. I guess by your logic and interpretation of The Koran,he must want the holy land to be claimed in the name of Islam,huh? Applying your interpretation and logic of Muslims to Christianity,that means all Christians hate gay people,right? And you DO realise that the bible contains passages that show a vengeful god,who punishes non believers much like Allah would,right? Guess that makes all Christians evil intolerant people too,right? Oh,wait a minute...the extremist Christians ARE evil intolerant people,just like the extremist Muslims are. Oh I read it alright...which is how I found this: Oh and this... And finally,this... If you're gonna discredit my use of David Duke as a source based on the fact that he's a racist,I most certainly can,in turn,discredit your use of this source based on the fact that it was written by high profile Israelis,whom I've been arguing from the beginning are terrorists and have been since their inception. and here is a list of some terrorist attacks against Israel BEFORE the 6 day war of 1967: Jan 1, 1952 - Seven armed terrorists attacked and killed a nineteen year-old girl in her home, in the neighborhood of Beit Yisrael, in Jerusalem. Apr 14, 1953 - Terrorists tried for the first time to infiltrate Israel by sea, but were unsuccessful. One of the boats was intercepted and the other boat escaped. June 7, 1953 - A youngster was killed and three others were wounded, in shooting attacks on residential areas in southern Jerusalem. June 9, 1953 - Terrorists attacked a farming community near Lod, and killed one of the residents. The terrorists threw hand grenades and sprayed gunfire in all directions. On the same night, another group of terrorists attacked a house in the town of Hadera. This occurred a day after Israel and Jordan signed an agreement, with UN mediation, in which Jordan undertook to prevent terrorists from crossing into Israel from Jordanian territory. June 10, 1953 - Terrorists infiltrating from Jordan destroyed a house in the farming village of Mishmar Ayalon. June 11, 1953 - Terrorists attacked a young couple in their home in Kfar Hess, and shot them to death. Sept 2, 1953 - Terrorists infiltrated from Jordan, and reached the neighborhood of Katamon, in the heart of Jerusalem. They threw hand grenades in all directions. Miraculously, no one was hurt. Mar 17, 1954 - Terrorists ambushed a bus traveling from Eilat to Tel Aviv, and opened fire at short range when the bus reached the area of Maale Akrabim in the northern Negev. In the initial ambush, the terrorists killed the driver and wounded most of the passengers. The terrorists then boarded the bus, and shot each passenger, one by one. Eleven passengers were murdered. Survivors recounted how the murderers spat on the bodies and abused them. The terrorists could clearly be traced back to the Jordanian border, some 20 km from the site of the terrorist attack. Jan 2, 1955 - Terrorists killed two hikers in the Judean Desert. Mar 24, 1955 - Terrorists threw hand grenades and opened fire on a crowd at a wedding in the farming community of Patish, in the Negev. A young woman was killed, and eighteen people were wounded in the attack. Apr 7, 1956 - A resident of Ashkelon was killed in her home, when terrorists threw three hand grenades into her house. Two members of Kibbutz Givat Chaim were killed, when terrorists opened fire on their car, on the road from Plugot Junction to Mishmar Hanegev. There were further hand grenade and shooting attacks on homes and cars, in areas such as Nitzanim and Ketziot. One person was killed and three others wounded. Apr 11, 1956 - Terrorists opened fire on a synagogue full of children and teenagers, in the farming community of Shafrir. Three children and a youth worker were killed on the spot, and five were wounded, including three seriously. Apr 29, 1956 - Egyptians killed Roi Rotenberg, 21 years of age, from Nahal Oz. Sept 12, 1956 - Terrorists killed three Druze guards at Ein Ofarim, in the Arava region. Sept 23, 1956 - Terrorists opened fire from a Jordanian position, and killed four archaeologists, and wounded sixteen others, near Kibbutz Ramat Rachel. Sept 24, 1956 - Terrorists killed a girl in the fields of the farming community of Aminadav, near Jerusalem. Oct 4, 1956 - Five Israeli workers were killed in Sdom. Oct 9, 1956 - Two workers were killed in an orchard of the youth village, Neve Hadassah, in the Sharon region. Nov 8, 1956 - Terrorists opened fire on a train, attacked cars and blew up wells, in the North and Center of Israel. Six Israelis were wounded. Feb 18, 1957 - Two civilians were killed by terrorist landmines, next to Nir Yitzhak, on the southern border of the Gaza Strip. Mar 8, 1957 - A shepherd from Kibbutz Beit Govrin was killed by terrorists in a field near the Kibbutz. Apr 16, 1957 - Terrorists infiltrated from Jordan, and killed two guards at Kibbutz Mesilot. May 20, 1957 - A terrorist opened fire on a truck in the Arava region, killing a worker. May 29, 1957 - A tractor driver was killed and two others wounded, when the vehicle struck a landmine, next to Kibbutz Kisufim. June 23, 1957 - Israelis were wounded by landmines, close to the Gaza Strip. Aug 23, 1957 - Two guards of the Israeli Mekorot water company were killed near Kibbutz Beit Govrin. Dec 21, 1957 - A member of Kibbutz Gadot was killed in the Kibbutz fields. Feb 11, 1958 - Terrorists killed a resident of Moshav Yanov who was on his way to Kfar Yona, in the Sharon area. Apr 5, 1958 - Terrorists lying in ambush shot and killed two people near Tel Lachish. Apr 22, 1958 - Jordanian soldiers shot and killed two fishermen near Aqaba. May 26, 1958 - Four Israeli police officers were killed in a Jordanian attack on Mt. Scopus, in Jerusalem. Nov 17, 1958 - Syrian terrorists killed the wife of the British air attache in Israel, who was staying at the guesthouse of the Italian Convent on the Mt. of the Beatitudes. Dec 3, 1958- A shepherd was killed at Kibbutz Gonen. In the artillery attack that followed, 31 civilians were wounded. Jan 23, 1959 - A shepherd from Kibbutz Lehavot Habashan was killed. Feb 1, 1959 - Three civilians were killed by a terrorist landmine near Moshav Zavdiel. Apr 15, 1959 - A guard was killed at Kibbutz Ramat Rahel. Apr 27, 1959 - Two hikers were shot at close range and killed near Massada. Sept 6, 1959 - Bedouin terrorists killed a paratroop reconnaissance officer near Nitzana. Sept 8, 1959 - Bedouins opened fire on an army bivouac in the Negev, killing an IDF officer, Captain Yair Peled. Oct 3, 1959 - A shepherd from Kibbutz Heftziba was killed near Kibbutz Yad Hana. Apr 26, 1960 - Terrorists killed a resident of Ashkelon south of the city. Apr 12, 1962 - Terrorists fired on an Egged bus on the way to Eilat; one passenger was wounded. Sept 30, 1962 - Two terrorists attacked an Egged bus on the way to Eilat. No one was wounded. Jan 1, 1965 - Palestinian terrorists attempted to bomb the National Water Carrier. This was the first attack carried out by the PLO's Fatah faction. May 31, 1965 - Jordanian Legionnaires fired on the neighborhood of Musrara in Jerusalem, killing two civilians and wounding four. June 1, 1965 - Terrorists attack a house in Kibbutz Yiftach. July 5, 1965 - A Fatah cell planted explosives at Mitzpe Massua, near Beit Guvrin; and on the railroad tracks to Jerusalem near Kafr Battir. Aug 26, 1965 - A waterline was sabotaged at Kibbutz Manara, in the Upper Galilee. Sept 29, 1965 - A terrorist was killed as he attempted to attack Moshav Amatzia. Nov 7, 1965 - A Fatah cell that infiltrated from Jordan blew up a house in Moshav Givat Yeshayahu, south of Beit Shemesh. The house was destroyed, but the inhabitants were miraculously unhurt. Apr 25, 1966 - Explosions placed by terrorists wounded two civilians and damaged three houses in Moshav Beit Yosef, in the Beit Shean Valley. May 16, 1966 - Two Israelis were killed when their jeep hit a terrorist landmine, north of the Sea of Galilee and south of Almagor. Tracks led into Syria. July 13, 1966 - Two soldiers and a civilian were killed near Almagor, when their truck struck a terrorist landmine. July 14, 1966 - Terrorists attacked a house in Kfar Yuval, in the North. July 19, 1966 - Terrorists infiltrated into Moshav Margaliot on the northern border and planted nine explosive charges. Oct 27, 1966 - A civilian was wounded by an explosive charge on the railroad tracks to Jerusalem. 2 things: #1:I find it funny that you have no problem providing a source on how evil Islam is,yet don't provide any sources for all of ^ #2:I've got something that predates ALL of that,prepetrated BY Israel www.cactus48.com/terrorism.htmlwww.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?ItemID=5169You would have caught that had you bothered to read ANY of the links I provided,which by your own admission you didn't. which brings me to this: THE BIBLE "Sarah your wife shall bear you a son, and you shall call his name Isaac. I will establish My covenant with him as an everlasting covenant for his descendants after him. As for Ishmael, I have heard you; behold, I will bless him and make him fruitful and multiply him exceedingly; he shall be the father of twelve princes, and I will make him a great nation." (Genesis 17:19-20 RSV). and what about ole Ishmael? "Behold, you are with child, and shall bear a son; you shall call his name Ishmael; because The Lord has given heed to your affliction. He shall be a wild ass of a man, his hand against every man and every man's hand against him; and he shall dwell over against all his kinsmen." (Genesis 16:11-12 RSV). that is the root of the conflict, whether you believe in the bible or not, it precedes Islam by a few hundred if not thousand years. And thats somehow supposed to change the fact that Israel commits acts of terrorism and has since its inception? Seriously though,quoting the bible isn't helping your case...in fact,it makes you look even more like a fanatical brainwashed idiot,trying to use faith to deny that Israel commits terrorist acts,which is the very definition of reaching. has a Jew ever commited an act of terrorism? yes. has an american? yes. does any rational person claim america is a terrorist nation? hello moron, do you not get it? The difference,moron,is that we're not just talking about just one Jew or one American...we're talking about an entire Jewish state that was FUCKING FOUNDED on terrorism and whose government has been commiting terrorist acts ever since...and some rational people WOULD consider America to be a terrorist country nowadays due to the actions of the government that runs it,particularly that of our dimwitted borderline facist president. The list of islamic fundie attacks on Israel goes all the way back to Genesis: Genesis 21:9-10 And Sarah saw the son of Hagar the Egyptian, which she had born unto Abraham, mocking. Wherefore she said unto Abraham, Cast out this bondwoman and her son.... (KJV) it doesnt matter if you believe in the bible or the koran, the jews and arabs both believe in them respectively. to ignore this is obtuse, but then again, it is Kefka the dumbass im talking too here. Thanks for the update on what texts are central to each religion/race as if I just arrived from Pluto,dickwipe. You wanna talk obtuse? Who's the idiot that keeps refusing to acknowledge that Israel commits acts of terrorism,by what the definition of terrorism is,and who didn't even bother reading any of the sources (besides David Duke the racist) I provided that proves this (yet expects me to read the source he provides on how Islam is an evil terrorist religion written by Israelis) and instead decided to automatically lump anybody that dares say that Israel are terrorists as "Muslim extremists" and "neo-nazis" eventhough one of the sources I used was written by a JEWISH group? Yea,thats what I thought... so exactly how long should Israel lay down and let the nations of Iran, Iraq, Syria and terrorists groups without number etc et al, attack them without fighting back? because they are Jews they should just take it? do you think you can beat a murderer in a fight by being diplomatic about things? or will it basically come down to who kills who first? pussies and losers take the diplomatic route when it comes to war. and when war is thrust upon you either way, there is only one answer, and that is to fight. Arabs have set a precedent of hate towards Israel for thousands of years now, and Arab nations set the precedence in support of Hitler and in the 6 Day war of 67'. Israel wont let things slide like we do (we are weak that way)The Holy land has been deeded to the Jews for a very long time, and Arabs do not have the right to kill Jews without regard because they dont have enough sense to move out of a fucking desert and build a house. First of all,I don't give a fuck about the "thousands of years" crap. We're focusing on Israel as a terrorist nation since its inception and nothing more. Second of all,lets say hypothetically that Israel is in fact doing nothing but defending their right to exist,which really they aren't defending themselves from anything they didn't intially start (they didn't just kick people out,but MASSACRED them),but for the sake of argument. Would you not agree that Israel kills what could be considered innocent civilians? There ARE ways to drastically minimise innocent casualties,but not only does Israel seem to not be interested in doing this,but they in fact kill innocent people ON PURPOSE.www.cactus48.com/terrorism.htmlSomething else too...I realise that David "Klan Member" Duke covered this,so maybe you just disreguarded it...but what about the incident involving the USS Liberty,a U.S. ship that was attacked DILIBERATLY BY the Israelis? home.cfl.rr.com/gidusko/liberty/www.ussliberty.org/www.whatreallyhappened.com/ussliberty.htmlwww.washington-report.org/backissues/0693/9306019.htmwww.lewrockwell.com/orig/margolis12.htmlwww.rense.com/general39/pilot.htmThe evidence against Israel just continues to pile up...yet here you are,defending their actions with the typical "they're just defending themselves" load of crap by citing The Bible and The Koran and irrelevent "thousand years ago" bullshit like that changes the fact that Israel commits acts of terrorism...at this point,it's ME that wants to kick the cowboy shit out of YOU. Game over,son...
|
|
|
Post by Fickle81 on Jul 17, 2006 20:24:31 GMT -5
The irony is truly through the fucking roof...and that's just the tip of the Hypocritical iceberg. How so? The difference is that I PURPOSEFULLY made those GIFs and PURPOSEFULLY uploaded them on the net because THEY WERE FUNNY. Somebody like Croyt The Angry gamer didn't even fucking know his tirades were being secretly recorded by his own brother,therefore,said tirades were sincere,while my knife,sword,and rave GIFs were tongue in cheek. The difference is clear to anybody with an ounce of rational thought process,which you've already long been proven to not have the slightest bit of. Tip of the hypocritical iceberg huh? Ok then slappy,lets explore that iceberg...tell me what else makes me a hypocrite? You made the statement,now back it up. all these apparent boards you frequent, all these apparent E-mailed confirmations of friends that have vouched for your idiocy from said boards. All these fucking 'friends' you swear by that can vouch for your badass online persona. But yet not one have apparently signed up with your self-obsessed kefchat board. Why?. Actually,moron,two of them indeed have...Red Spyder and Gojinn (gave a link to the former,didn't to the latter). They left due to the place being boring for them,which is absolutly fine by me. And I believe I've already covered why I haven't even told most of the others about this board,and since you apparently already know about my post where I had friends email me to confirm the existence of a board I used to have,I'm surprised you're even asking me this question...seeing as how the answer was in said post you referenced: kefchat.proboards59.com/index.cgi?board=talk9&action=display&thread=1125802428&page=26#1149382916Besides the spelling/typing error in the last sentence,witness #2 hit that sucker out of the park... and no I haven't told them about this board yet because if I did,it would kill the quiet vibe the board has that I like at least temporarally.If I REALLY wanted this board to have a whole bunch of members,it would have a whole bunch of members. I would IM people with the link AND post the link on all the other messageboards I frequent or have frequented...but I don't because thats not the type of messageboard I want. Out of the 38 members registered on this board,only 3 of them learned about it via me telling them about it and providing a link. You debunk yourself before anybody else even bothers. Really? Is that so? How exactly? Once again,you made the statement,now back it up. Your a self-obsessed strange little troll. Self-obsessed? In a way,sure. As for strange,I'm sure an illogical thinking bitch like yourself WOULD consider me strange,seeing as how I actually apply rational and logical thought process before typing. And how am I a troll exactly? A troll is somebody that contributes absolutly nothing but conflict...while I may cause quite a bit of conflict,thats definatly not the only thing I contribute. You deserve pity, yet your total inability to interact outside of your own mind suggest otherwise. Inability to interact outside of my own mind? What the hell does that even mean you dipshitted fuckwipe? That doesn't make a lick of sense considering the amount of friends I have,whom I have both agreed and disagreed with for as long as I've known them. At times,yes... If nothing else you possess the ability to make people laugh at you. Absolutly...but in some instances,I'm not the one they should be laughing at due to their own stupidity... Do your worst...amuse yourself. It truly is the only skill you possess. Says the bitch with borderline split personalities and bipolar inconsistency who has terrible digital imaging skills.
|
|
locke
Untouchable
Posts: 6
|
Post by locke on Jul 17, 2006 22:41:23 GMT -5
How so? The difference is that I PURPOSEFULLY made those GIFs and PURPOSEFULLY uploaded them on the net because THEY WERE FUNNY. But why would you do such a thing as to entice such ridicule upon yourself?... the rave gif i can accept beause you were in pretty deep by then...but the penknife and sword swinging i find highly questionable. If you like poking fun at yourself for said antics then granted... i appreciate you poking fun at yourself for whatever attention seeking reasons you must feel the urge to... i guess. It almost puts you on par with characters such as Mr_Mood_Swing...agreed?. slappy,moron,dipshitted,fuckwipe Again with all the slander...no need for such stone throwing in an adult world. terrible digital imaging skills And your basing what on this exactly?...a lack of digital imaging skill represents what?. An inability to expose you?. but I don't because thats not the type of messageboard I want So what type of message board do you desire?...one that revolves around you?. Congratulations. If certain individuals find that boring then so be it...but the premise remains. It's all about you...if it isn't...then it should be?. Says the bitch with borderline split personalities and bipolar inconsistency who has terrible digital imaging skills. There you go with the insults again... surely you can thrash this out without the need to resort to inaccurate slurs. And since when has the ability or lack of in this apparent instance meant shit when exposing you as a self-obsessed troll?. They left due to the place being boring for them You mean you bore the shit out of them?. Figures...if it not for your tomfoolery... the entire cast of any escapade you endeavour would surely rest in slumber. That would never settle with you...right?. One reason for making this list is to remind the biggest committers of these crimes against human intelligence... just how stupid they really are,which will most likely lead to reason #2 You mean as you do when you resort to verbal slurs to get your 'point' across?. A good and fair question. The reason why I'm in the position to create a list of the 50 biggest idiots on the entire vast world of the internet is because fuck you. while at the same time amusing and entertaining the hell out of me. The third reason? I like to write about idiots...simple enough. Case 1 for sheer Hypocrasy. As for what qualifies me...well the fact that I'm not the average drooling internet fucktard for one Case 2 for sheer Hypocrasy. Why September 11th? Whew...I don't normally get political,but this is a situation where it had to be done. Knowledge of the tragedy and 5 year anniversary of it aside,it's just like any other normal day to me. Because you knew it was such an Historical event and you thought you'd take advantage in your selfish trollish way by 'co-incidently' using this date to attract attention to yourself. The lack of respect on your behalf reeks of self-absortion. Why i'm entertaining this bullshit beggars belief. But then your existance and sheer Hypocrasy and lack of respect negates anything this world can surely throw back at one.
|
|
|
Post by Fickle81 on Jul 18, 2006 0:24:12 GMT -5
But why would you do such a thing as to entice such ridicule upon yourself?... Because contrary to popular belief,I have a sense of humour that allows me to laugh at myself...pretty damn simple,huh? the rave gif i can accept beause you were in pretty deep by then...but the penknife and sword swinging i find highly questionable. Look closely at my facial expressions in both of those...it's obvious to anyone with working eyesight that even I know the scenarios are ridiculous and funny...maybe thats why I was PARODYING them. If you like poking fun at yourself for said antics then granted... i appreciate you poking fun at yourself for whatever attention seeking reasons you must feel the urge to... i guess. Oh so now I'm doing it for attention,huh? Yea,thats why I posted the rave one on my own board,that while it is read by a select group of people,barely gets much traffic. It's real simple...I think they're funny,so I make,upload,and post them. I really don't care if others find it funny or not. If they do,great...if not,great...as long as I get a laugh out of them,thats all that counts. Again with all the slander...no need for such stone throwing in an adult world. Like YOU haven't taken part in said "stone throwing",you whiney hypocritical doucherag? Jesus you're fucking dilusional to the point of badly needing shock treatment... Hey!. Hey you...yeah you. The 80lb sack of shit with the penknife and self-proclaimed beautiful hair. (FYI semen stain,I weigh about 156 pounds last I checked) And btw,slander is the act of making false oral statements about somebody...everytime I call you a dipshit,irrational bitch,hypocrite,etc etc,those aren't false statements because I have evidence that makes the statements true...in fact,you just gave me yet another piece of evidence above. And your basing what on this exactly?...a lack of digital imaging skill represents what?. An inability to expose you?. No,based on the fact that every single "newspaper clipping" picture you've doctured up has all sorts of ridiculous gaps and spaces that shouldn't be there and wouldn't if they were made by somebody with digital imaging talent...and yea,you even suck at the "exposing me" end of it,making ridiculous claims like I most likely do what I do due to a bad childhood,when I had no such bad childhood. www.kefchat.proboards59.com/index.cgi?board=talk9&action=display&thread=1125802428&page=25#1147418778So what type of message board do you desire?...one that revolves around you?. Congratulations. If certain individuals find that boring then so be it...but the premise remains. It's all about you...if it isn't...then it should be?. The board is about me,my opinions on things,and apparently others opinions on my opinions of things along with their own opinions on things...plus the occational piece of interesting news I find. There you go with the insults again... There you go whining as if you don't deserve every bit of them again... surely you can thrash this out without the need to resort to inaccurate slurs. LMAO! Inaccurate? I've got posts upon posts of your own statements and actions that show they're QUITE accurate... And since when has the ability or lack of in this apparent instance meant shit when exposing you as a self-obsessed troll?. Since it became a popular and strategic tactic to expose the lack of ability as a means of completely discrediting one trying to expose me as a self-obsessed troll (you're only half right,btw)...which happened quite a long time ago... You mean you bore the shit out of them?. No,there weren't enough topics they were interested in to keep them interested in posting here. Figures...if it not for your tomfoolery... the entire cast of any escapade you endeavour would surely rest in slumber. That would never settle with you...right?. YOU...are trying to accuse ME of tomfoolery? You...the individual who has to use an alternate screen name in order to argue with somebody,when you couldn't just use your regular one? You HONESTLY think you have ANY room whatsoever in calling me a hypocrite? If you do,then there would be inmates in nuthouses that had a better grasp on reality than you. Did you ever stop to think that maybe the reason people are interested in what I write/do online is because I do it in an interesting way? Maybe thats why I've made it into the Hall of Fame of 2 of the biggest most well known E-Feds on the web,which requires a great deal of creativity when it comes to writting and/or doing things. I write and do interesting things,have interesting opinions,and express said opinions in an interesting way. You mean as you do when you resort to verbal slurs to get your 'point' across?. How exactly is quoting YOUR OWN statements and replying to them appropriately verbal slurs? If you deserve to be called an irrational hypocritical bitch based on your own statements and actions,then thats what you're gonna get called. Case 1 for sheer Hypocrasy. Wow,nice job at editing 2 seperate statements together from completely different portions of the FAQ in an attempt at thinking you have something...especially one statement that was a JOKE (the one that ends with "fuck you") only to seriously answer the question in the very next paragraph that you DIDN'T include,and the other which are 2 simple facts that the reactions of dipshits like you to me showing how big of dipshits you are is amusing to me and the fact that I like to write about idiots like you...I'm sure Legend envies your skills at selective quote/statement editing. Tell ya what...lets look at this from a legal perspective and as if you were a lawyer trying to make an actual case...case 1 would be thrown out due to tampering with statements/evidence on your part to make up something that isn't there,which is actually a crime...maybe even a federal offense. Not only would you most likely be disbarred,you'll probably even serve some jail/prison time. Case 2 for sheer Hypocrasy. This case would be thrown out due to the presentation of mounds of evidence that discredits you (that strategic measure I talked about earlier,remember) and proves that your application of me being "an average drooling internet fucktard" should actually be applied to you...with the only difference being the replacement of the word "average" with "extreme" Because you knew it was such an Historical event and you thought you'd take advantage in your selfish trollish way by 'co-incidently' using this date to attract attention to yourself. The lack of respect on your behalf reeks of self-absortion. Yea,nevermind the fact that it's actually closer to MY 5 year anniversary of being online...[sarcasm]nope,I'm ONLY doing it to take advantage of a tragic day in history to attract attention.[/sarcasm] And by the way,it only STARTS on September 11 with idiots 50-41...it ends on September 15...Keep reaching though,please... Why i'm entertaining this bullshit beggars belief. But then your existance and sheer Hypocrasy and lack of respect negates anything this world can surely throw back at one. Look who's talking...
|
|