|
Post by Fickle81 on Feb 13, 2006 19:53:29 GMT -5
"You just think you're so much smarter than everyone else,don't you you arrogant prick?"
Not everyone else,no...just scatterbrained nimrods like you that try to use somebody's intelligence as an insult to cover up the fact that you're a total dipshit...I would rather be articulate,nerd,geek,bookworm,whatever term you want to use than a drooling braindead idiot that makes Down Syndrome patients look like Stephen Hawking.
|
|
|
Post by Fickle81 on Feb 15, 2006 22:38:03 GMT -5
"Internet geek"Kinda like "social geek" (cause the internet IS a social gathering,like a bar)? Which is a juxtiposition? Glad we cleared that up... And I guess that makes a lot of women geeks,cause at one time, the amount of women using the internet outnumbered the amount of men:www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,17974,00.asp Seriously...how exactly can you be an internet geek when the internet is a form of social interaction,which geeks tend to avoid? That doesn't even make sense you dolts...
|
|
|
Post by Fickle81 on Feb 16, 2006 16:13:04 GMT -5
"You're an embarrasment to the human race."
Considering how utterly embarrasing the majority of the human race is already,and the fact that me pointing that out apparently makes me an embarrasment in the eyes of said embarrasment of a race (which obviously includes you),I consider that a compliment...
|
|
|
Post by Fickle81 on Feb 17, 2006 23:31:39 GMT -5
amicus/shivers:
"trying really hard to earn an internet reputation"
That is the most hilarious and ironic thing coming from you,an individual that tries his damndest to be a blatent shitstiring prickwad...which by the way,is by definition an "internet reputation."
Awfully hypocritical don't ya think?
|
|
|
Post by Fickle81 on Feb 19, 2006 17:34:01 GMT -5
"Lets get back on topic"
Or what? What are you gonna do if we don't? What are you,the thread police? Making sure every single thread stays on topic? If you notice,threads occationally swaying off topic are what keeps said threads alive and going. And you could have very well just commented on the subject and not even bothered with everything else going on since it doesn't concern you. WE'LL decide when to go back on topic,not you.
|
|
|
Post by Fickle81 on Feb 27, 2006 8:59:21 GMT -5
Enough is enough... I may soon make this into a ytmnd...stay tuned...
|
|
|
Post by Fickle81 on Mar 1, 2006 18:53:51 GMT -5
"Act like an adult!"
In other words,don't act any differently than I do already? Will do,thanks!
You fucking dipshit,adults act in a manner that can be considered "immature" just as much as anyone else,so stop trying to hide behind that mis mal bullshit.
Prime example...my father recently had his Yahoo account hacked by 2 bitches in their thirtys,all over a dispute of playing what was percieved to be shitty music in a chatroom.
So much for adults not making a big deal out of nothing on the internet huh?
|
|
|
Post by Fickle81 on Jun 12, 2006 23:47:41 GMT -5
I'm gonna reference my old buddy swivel for this one... "For those of you who suffer through Kefka's lame-ass posting style, you are already aware that Kefka does not put spaces after his commas. He has given various reasons for why he does this, and I would like to devote a thread to how much of a dumbass this makes Kefka look."Hey assmonkey...did you ever stop to think for just one second before running your jibs from being so offended that somebody exposed your blatent idiocy that borderlines inbreeding,that the common and accepted trend thats been in tact pretty much since the internet's inception is people having their own standard of writting,which includes quirky and most of the time flat out wrong use of grammar and punctuation? Well,the lack of space after a comma is mine and has been since my internet beginnings...however unlike most people with their own writting style,I actually have good reasons for why I do this. But of course,I can't expect somebody who admits they're stupid but tries to act smart anyway and who won't put down their hardback copy of "The Female's Guide To Arguments and Comebacks" for even a minute and actually use an ounce of prethought before putting fingers to the keyboard to not only be able to comprehend and accept something like that,but to avoid the chronic overuse of phrases such as "internet narcissist","your posting style sucks ass",and the ever popular claim that all I do is reference the biased source known as Wikipedia in arguments because I don't know what I'm talking about beforehand...nevermind that I already knew that what I said that started said arguments was truth before refencing ANYTHING and the only reason I reference anything is to prove to dumbasses like you that what I say is indeed 100% documented fact and truth. By the way,I'm gonna do what you couldn't nor wouldn't ever do when you were asked to...I'm actually gonna provide you with one of if not THE ONLY example where I've ever referenced Wikipedia...and it wasn't so much me referencing Wiki as it was Answers referencing Wiki. It was during an argument on BD's Official Wrestling thread where the following idiotic and untrue statement was made: Ite:After using my knowledge and complete assurance that this was complete bullshit,I eventually won the argument with the following response: www.bloody-disgusting.com/forums/showpost.php?p=127174&postcount=1033If you click on that Answers link,which is the ENCYCLOPEDIA site that I usually reference in arguments when my word isn't good enough to show how stupid one is (because Wikipedia isn't a true encyclopedia site as anybody can write and edit reference articles,unlike Answers which actually bases all their articles from real encyclopedias or anything else where the material written about is proven fact),you'll see the article thats referenced from them is a Wikipedia article. I surely hope this wasn't your groundbreaking overwhelming amount of evidence that proves I lie about always referencing Wikipedia. Oh,but if you're reading this,I'll bet your next brillient strategy is to inform me that since Answers referenced Wikipedia,which isn't a trusted and reliable source,that makes Answers to be an untrustworthy and unreliable source,and that I'm a hypocrite for not only not knowing this but also sanctioning a Wikipedia reference when I've already documented my distrust for the site...would I be right to bet on that? You might have had a point in this instance if that Wikipedia article wasn't totally correct in everything that was written in it. See,unlike Wikipedia,Answers doesn't publish and/or reference any kind of informational article unless it's complete fact. This is one of those cases where a Wikipedia article was completely reliable,hence why Answers referenced it. But I'm sure you think I didn't know this until I looked it up and referenced it,right? Too bad if you go back 4 pages from where I made that post of mine I quoted above,I actually said that the WWF Attitude era was in fact influenced if not straight up ripped off from ECW www.bloody-disgusting.com/forums/showpost.php?p=126824&postcount=996How do I know this? Because I'm a fan of the wrestling business (not just what I see on TV) and that is common knowledge in the wrestling world...yes common knowledge...you know? That thing that you say... swivel:If you STILL have a mediocre bitch about it,I'll just go ahead and wipe the slate clean by referencing something else OTHER than Wikipedia or Answers (which referenced Wikipedia) that proves the point I was trying to make is 100% correct www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0FCO/is_6_2/ai_71403980/pg_4Thre ya go...that cancels out that 1 Wiki reference...now,I challenge you,for about the 6th time,to actually find and publicly document any other examples of me referencing Wikipedia. For once in your miserable mongoloid roofer existence,try actually backing up one of your assurd statements...if thats too hard for you on account of you being a moron who has absolutly no clue as to what he's talking about,then please do shut the hell up for a really REALLY long time.
|
|
|
Post by Fickle81 on Jun 30, 2006 8:03:27 GMT -5
Any retort about somebody being a bully on a messageboard/the internet:www.answers.com/topic/bullyWhat the idiots that make accusations such as this don't realise is that in order to be a bully,you have to be intimadating or overbearing. How in the hell is it possible for somebody's,who probably isn't anywhere geographically near the individual who their statements are addressed to,text,in which the individual(s) said text is addressed to HAS THE CHOICE WHETHER OR NOT TO READ AND RESPOND TO,to be considered intimadating or overbearing? And I can throw out that whole "smaller and weaker people" part in the first definition,cause chances are 9 times out of 10 somebody is gonna respond to something a "bully" addresses to them,which basically doesn't make them weak or smaller at all. Anybody that accuses someone of being a bully online are dilusional,have severe victim issues,and are in dire need of either some intensive conseling or a one way trip to the tomb farm...Period.
|
|
|
Post by Fickle81 on Sept 20, 2009 10:38:06 GMT -5
"Pain is weekness leaving the body".
Bullshit...pain is your body's way of telling you "Look dumbfuck,if you don't stop doing what you're doing that's causing this,you're gonna be in a world of shit"! What if you get shot up real bad to the point that you go into shock and possibly die? Is THAT "weakness leaving the body",assholes? Sounds more like your soul leaving the body to me. Enough with the false positive motivational reenforcement you cocksuckers...it doesn't work when the FACTS contradict that shit.
|
|
|
Post by Fickle81 on Sept 20, 2009 10:39:41 GMT -5
"PT/exercise pain/struggling is 70-90% mental".
Oh really? Is that why people suffer heat injuries,usually due to dehydration? Is that why some people DIE due to the aforementioned reason? Is that why people sometimes vomit and/or struggle to breathe and/or pass out during a run? I don't know about you,but it sure looks like that measly 10-30% plays a bigger role than lead to believe...either that or it's A LOT FUCKING MORE THAN 10-30% YOU ASSBAGS!
This goes back to the whole thing of pain being your body's way of letting you know you're doing/did something wrong. I know some people like to live in some magical yum yum gumdrop dream world where any and all pain can simply be overcome by either not thinking about it or having your mind tell your body to stop feeling pain...but that's not reality now is it? No see,the reality is that we live in a world that has limitations of all sorts,one of which is personal physical limitations. Sure,sometimes you can push yourself beyond a limitation you had or thought you had,but eventually you're gonna cave because the mind can only take do/put up with so much. Hell,if all we had to do was let our mind take away pain and other things of that nature,we wouldn't need to drink water or eat food now would we? We would all just let our minds replenish us with mere thoughts.
Seriously,knock off the bullshit and live in the real goddamn world already...said bullshit does not go together/fit with the facts of life,so why bother having it? To make life easier? Well,guess what? IT DOESN'T FUCKING WORK!
|
|